Vingt Heures logo |
Every day at 8pm my host parents turn on the news. We start eating at 7, so this is about usually
around the time we finish with the main course and start eating cheese. The
program is called Vingt Heures (20th hour) and it’s the daily news that comes on every day at 20:00 (8:00pm). I don’t
understand everything they discuss mainly because I don’t understand French
perfectly and also because the newscaster speaks incredibly fast. From what I have
seen thus far, the program speaks of every topic available from international
politics to a local farmer who produced his record amount of wine for the
year.
Donald Trump himself |
I’ve noticed that the most recent covered topic has been the
American primary race. It seems bizarre to me that French people are so
invested in politics of other nations, because there are so many Americans who
don’t even know the politics of their own country, let alone a foreign one! It
must be the mindset that the next country is only a couple hours away by car. Vingt Heures spent a lot of time on
Donald Trump and my host parents were especially interested in him. Bear in
mind that my host parents often spend their free time at the prefecture’s
office protesting against the harsh immigration laws, building houses for the homeless, and making me food. I found myself
explaining that Donald Trump is, in fact, running for president, that he was a
reality TV star, and that he is very popular among many Americans. My host
parents were shocked that so many US citizens are willing to vote for someone
who’s political platform incudes views that seem to be regressing the social
norms of the world. If Vingt Heures
didn’t spend so much time on Trump, I would have thought they were relatively
unbiased for a news station. I believe
now that my French news source is more left-leaning, and that is a more common
view in France seeing as one of their main political parties is the Parti Socialiste.
Here is the tram, arriving on time, I might add |
In addition to American politics, the news covers almost
everything else, as I mentioned before, although there haven’t been exuberant
amounts of cheery news. There is a phrase in French that my host parents said to me that explains this: “On ne parle pas
des trains qui arrivent à l’heure” which means “We don’t talk about trains
that arrive on time.” Basically when the news only shows the world constantly at
war with each other, a train accident last week, natural disasters striking
various unprepared developing nations, etc., that is not to say that there are not
good things happening too. It is only expected that the train will arrive on
time, and if it doesn’t then people have something to talk about. It is
slightly saddening to realize this isn’t unique to France, but to the United
States too; that the breaking news and prime time spots are covered by stories
that would have been boring if nothing had gone wrong.
In general, the news in France is more concerned with others
rather than just itself. I think that’s great because it’s always important to
know what the happenings of the world are. The French portray themselves
relatively honestly, meaning from what I’ve seen they neither over praise nor undermine
themselves. They could focus more on out-of-the-ordinary cheery stories, in my
opinion, but we need to work on that too. Most of their coverage focuses on
concrete subjects, especially people and events going on around the world, but
they include ideological issues such as the recent reform to work and
education, which I will talk about in my next blog on education. All in all, French news assesses global
topics with more in depth knowledge than US newscasters do.
Until next time, bloggers!
"On ne parle pas des trains qui arrivent à l'heure" definitely captures it! I've also noticed the way that the French seem to be very loyal to certain programs which they always keep up with. It's interesting too that you have noticed the French news being relatively honest - which I think is a good way to capture the idea of being relatively fair in the way they represent themselves. I could see that being true, but hadn't thought much about it in that way!
ReplyDelete